No socks, please..?
Re: No socks, please..?
Perhaps Mr Walker could best explain the good side of socks by telling her (TT) about Ash's Uncle.
I do miss him dearly.
I do miss him dearly.
Credo quia absurdum.
Re: No socks, please..?
Why don't you tell me?Dr Exile wrote:Perhaps Mr Walker could best explain the good side of socks by telling her (TT) about Ash's Uncle.
I do miss him dearly.
Re: No socks, please..?
I'll check it out at homeSnow Crash wrote:A young Ray Winstone demonstrates an excellent alternative use for socks:
Re: No socks, please..?
lkwalker wrote:I don't know why. I just do.
Why isn't being yourself with your one name good enough?
Edit: I did not see the other 12 pages BRB
Re: No socks, please..?
lkwalker wrote:It was an art in my hands. My online persona has always been as a syndicate. No-one had a problem with that until it was emulated by a bunch of douchebags. But even then- what did it matter?
LIVE UPDATES..
That would be cool to have again...
Nothing was so impressive on any of the multiverse of forums I visit (And I still have named em all and yes I am human) as live update.
Your in the middle of a post and BLAM UPDATE....
that was KING!
Re: No socks, please..?
lkwalker wrote:So you're convinced tat this Screammm character is a WITD sock? Is that Doc asshole a sock too?
I am responsible for both doc and scream.
I brought doc...Or rather he followed me from AO....Scream followed me from AP.
I am an amkoid.
I went seeking the older members like apeci , kacen , and json himself and I sought new folks too.
Still doc and scream those are my bads... or goods... depends on the perspective ....Not so fond of doc but I could ignore or look over scream... his all caps posting style never bothered me...nor his vids...although I do understand the vids can slow a computer down...something I don't think scream fully understands yet.
Re: No socks, please..?
lkwalker wrote:I agree. So where is the sock problem over there? I don't see it.
I have five socks there I think....
I named each sock anarch followed by a number.... I was argueing with jack and testing the limites of the improved ignore feature....
That is also when I learned amkon did not need a valid email addy to register.
I liked it better that way... It made the ignore /self moderation feature perfect....I did not even have to start a new thread.....I could just re-register a thousand times if I really wanted to be a prick.... but I would get tired...as any troll would.... still jack is a dipshit.
Re: No socks, please..?
Egg wrote:There's always Tor. But, I believe that Scream and Doc Viscosity are authentic.
Even I use Tor from time to time....Thank you pack.
Re: No socks, please..?
lkwalker wrote:I'm still scratching my head about the time Hazel and WITD signed in on the same computer. hahahahah
Their was something wrong with that.
Re: No socks, please..?
TraumaT wrote:
Yes, it's about trust. Simple as that.
It is.