Congressional UAP hearing May 17, 2022

Post Reply
User avatar
Pigeon
Posts: 18065
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:00 pm

Congressional UAP hearing May 17, 2022

Post by Pigeon » Tue May 17, 2022 9:22 pm

For what it is worth, someone's summary of the hearings

This was clearly Moultrie hand holding Bray and they have no intention of being honest and open with the public. If you take their language at face value, including their unintentional tells, and slips this what they said. They have recovered materials or crafts but metallurgy analysis doesn’t according to them, indicate non-terrestrial materials. They have metallurgy specialists they consult with per Brays statements. UAP have a connection with the ocean and water per Moultries quick interruption and misdirection to closed door briefings on the subject. We coordinate and share “some” information with our allied military governments. UAP interactions have changed or influenced our technology and sensor capabilities have been refined to study UAP. We’ve tried to communicate with them, and Bray needed to restrain his answer carefully meaning this is sensitive information and he needed to be clearly obtuse in his answer. They don’t think the multi sensor data they have is faulty and they work based on the assumption it is accurate and functioning properly. UAP had flight characteristics based on that data that isn’t explainable to them, I.E. performance capabilities outside our material sciences and physics of movement that isn’t conventional which combines the problem of energy requirements to perform those capabilities. So when they say they can’t explain flight characteristics, they are essentially saying, speed, movement, energy requirements, material structural composition and design that allows for such performance.

Finally, LaHood, acting on behalf of the DoD attempting to lay the ground work for the DoD and congress to pass laws restricting open conversations with regard to UAP phenomenon was clearly scripted and shows that the effort to continue lying and deceiving the public will continue and they will try to criminally hold accountable statements made in the public sphere regarding UAP by individuals or groups that study UAP. LaHood is a puppet and clearly anti disclosure.


User avatar
Pigeon
Posts: 18065
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:00 pm

Re: Congressional UAP hearing May 17, 2022

Post by Pigeon » Tue May 17, 2022 9:23 pm



On Tuesday, May 17, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. ET, the House Intelligence Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation Subcommittee, chaired by Congressman André Carson (D-Ind.) will hold an open hearing on unidentified aerial phenomena. Following the open portion of the hearing, the subcommittee will hold a closed, classified briefing.

User avatar
Royal
Posts: 10568
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:55 pm

Re: Congressional UAP hearing May 17, 2022

Post by Royal » Thu May 19, 2022 3:10 am


User avatar
Pigeon
Posts: 18065
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:00 pm

Re: Congressional UAP hearing May 17, 2022

Post by Pigeon » Sun May 22, 2022 11:04 pm

The Drive's Adam Kehoe noticed something during this week's UFO hearings in the U.S. Congress. "After intense public speculation, stacks of official documents obtained via the Freedom Of Information Act, ambiguous statements from top officials, and an avalanche of media attention, it has now been made clear that the mysterious swarming of U.S. Navy ships off the Southern California coast in 2019 was caused by drones, not otherworldly UFOs or other mysterious craft.

"Raising even more questions, a similar drone swarm event has occurred off another coast, as well."
These revelations came from top Department of Defense officials during a recent and much-anticipated house hearing on UFOs, which you can read all about here.

The strange series of events in question unfolded around California's Channel Islands in July of 2019. On multiple evenings, swarms of unidentified drones were spotted operating around U.S. Navy vessels. In numerous instances, the drones flew within close proximity to ships, even crossing directly over their decks. The behavior provoked defensive reactions from the ships, including the deployment of emergency security teams... Deck logs demonstrate that the Navy appears to have drilled and implemented a variety of counter-drone techniques in response to these incidents. This eventually included the deployment of Northrop Grumman's Drone Restricted Access Using Known EW (DRAKE) platform. The DRAKE system is a man-portable backpack that allows sailors to use radio frequency signals to interrupt the control links of drones. The DRAKE system appears to have been actually deployed in one of the incidents....

It is entirely unclear where the drones were operating from, how they were controlled, or who was controlling them. Still, the Navy could identify the objects as drones without those questions being fully answered at this time.... The Department of Defense's open acknowledgment of these drone swarm events just off U.S. shores shows that the threat is not theoretical. It is also not a future threat. Significant drone swarm events have occurred in the last three years, unknown to the public, and evidently unresolved by defense authorities. Judging by what is known to date about the 2019 incident, it is clear that the United States is not well-positioned to detect, identify and neutralize such threats. It remains to be seen what level of priority these issues will receive by lawmakers in relation to more speculative questions surrounding UAP.

If anything else, top confirmation that adversaries are operating swarms among America's most powerful weapons in training areas where their most sensitive capabilities are put to use should make national headlines, but because it was buried in sensationalism around UFOs, it clearly did not.
Link


Post Reply